Letters

Cartoon courtesy of the St. Helena Star and Artist Joan Martens
Local papers
- August 12, 2008 - Angwin Reporter
Save
Rural Angwin Going All Out
- March 3, 2008 - Angwin Reporter
PUC
defeats community Plan...Temporarily
- April 13, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC plan poses a litany of problems
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
How will PUC use its endowment?
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Tunnel vision in Angwin, Napa
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Offer affordable housing equally
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin doesn’t need mansions
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC project foes defended
- April 12, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC finances merit checking
- April 10, 2007 - Napa Register:
Public not truly heard on PUC plan
- April 9, 2007 - Napa Register:
A look at PUC's books
- April 6, 2007 - Napa Register:
The meanest comment yet on PUC plan
- April 5, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC unveils 391-unit development proposal
- April 5, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin already is a true eco-village
- April 5, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC scales back plan, but foes remain
- April 5, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC plan too much for Angwin
- April 4, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
County forced to mull Angwin
- April 4, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC: Show us the details
- April 4, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC drops 200 homes from Angwin plan
- April 2, 2007 - Napa Register:
Where PUC project and county plans meet
- April 1, 2007 - Napa Register:
'We are smarter' than PUC/Triad plan
- March 29, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC, Triad: put all your cards on table
- March 29, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC sets the record straight on project
- March 29, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC plan merits open discussion
- March 28, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC plan worries mobile home owner
- March 26, 2007 - Napa Register:
Work together on Angwin plan
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Project foes meet
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Dillon’s right on impact of 600 homes
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
SDA church should take control of PUC
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Reduction in size of project welcome
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Eco-village plans sadden PUC alumna
- March 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Other ways for PUC to raise revenue
- March 16, 2007 - Napa Register:
The answer is in the question
- March 16, 2007 - Napa Register:
Readers on Angwin
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin development foes meeting Sunday
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Attack on Dillon insults intelligence
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Wake up Angwin, wolf is at the door
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Student supports development plan
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Dillon's stand on Angwin project is commendable
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC president wrong: opposition growing to plan
- March 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Herb Ford 'sets record straight'
- March 11, 2007 - Angwin Reporter:
Protest Rally to Challenge Triad/PUC Development
- March 9, 2007 - Napa Register:
Dillon's cheap political shot
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Triad tried before to develop valley
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Dillon opposition to project surprising
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Cost of housing sky-high in Angwin
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Shame on Dillon for remarks on PUC plan
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Eco-village can help PUC thrive
- March 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Let's tone down rhetoric on eco-village plans
- March 8, 2007 - Napa Register:
Dillon shouldn't dismiss PUC project
- March 6, 2007 - Napa Register:
Trying to make Angwin, PUC better
- March 6, 2007 - Napa Register:
Help PUC succeed
- March 5, 2007 - Napa Register:
Dillon: Thumbs down on PUC plan
- March 2, 2007 - Napa Register:
Angwin doesn't need 590 homes
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Dillon: Angwin development too big
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC project won't fix remiss finances
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Library director backs PUC project
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC employees ones supporting project
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Open discussion stymied in Angwin
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Cost of housing sky-high in Angwin
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Many are afraid to oppose PUC plan
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Allow Angwin to remain rural area
- March 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Triad out of touch on jobs in Angwin
- February 27, 2007 - Angwin Reporter:
More traffic major objection to College/Triad Subdivisions
- February 24, 2007 - Napa Register:
Get to know the faces of PUC
- February 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Who will buy new houses in Angwin?
- February 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC's initial plans show much potential
- February 22, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Traffic and safety concerns in Angwin
- February 20, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC playing by rules to meet needs
- February 19, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC s creative solution
- February 17, 2007 - Napa Register:
Eco-Village or no, PUC deserves respect
- February 16, 2007 - Napa Register:
Angwin on the cusp of greatness
- February 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Development way for PUC to get funds
- February 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
What Angwin project means to St. Helena
- February 15, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC has made deal with the devil
- February 15, 2007 - PUC Campus Chronicle
The student body of PUC...
- February 12, 2007 - Napa Register:
An irresponsible plan in Angwin
- February 11, 2007 - Napa Register:
Napa's ecosystem versus Angwin 'Eco-Village'
- February 10, 2007 - PUC Campus Chronicle letter
- February 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC project secures a better future
- February 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Surely a better way than Triad project
- February 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Sold out community for PUC endowment
- February 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
New Angwin development? say it ain’t so, PUC!
- February 8, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
County committee reviews Angwin development proposal
- February 7, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC maintaining its mission with Eco-Village
- February 7, 2007 - Napa Register:
Plan for Angwin is unacceptable
- February 6, 2007 - PUC Campus Chronicle letter
- February 6, 2007 - PUC Campus Chronicle The Triad Interview
- February 4, 2007 - Napa Register:
The flaws in PUC housing plan
- February 3, 2007 - Napa Register:
Say it ain't so, PUC
- February 3, 2007 - Napa Register:
Protect Angwin from development
- February 2, 2007 - Napa Register:
Bait-and-switch in Angwin?
- February 1, 2007 - Napa Register:
Who s clamoring to move to Angwin?
- February 1, 2007 - Napa Register:
Pacific Union College s Angwin expansion plan stirs more debate
- February 1, 2007 - Napa Register:
Angwin village not good for us
- February 1, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Surely a better way than triad project
- January 31, 2007 - Napa Register:
Objecting to PUC s quantum leap
- January 30, 2007 - Napa Register:
Support PUC plan for Angwin
- January 29, 2007 - Napa Register:
From the Editor: Down here on the ground
- January 27, 2007 - Napa Register:
PUC adds elements to 'eco-village' after public gathering
- January 27, 2007 - Napa Register:
Angwin plan a slap in the face
- January 25, 2007 - Napa Register:
Excited by ideas for Angwin
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Fate of Angwin project could hinge on county approval
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Development plans get mixed reviews from Angwinites
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Enlarging angwin adds to fire danger
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
American Canyon planned for Angwin?
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin eco-village a welcome renewal
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin project also affects St. Helena
- January 25, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Whatever happened to visioning process?
- January 24, 2007 - Napa Register:
Angwin is not a company town
- January 21, 2007 - Napa Register:
Liking the plans for Angwin
- January 22, 2007 - Napa Register:
A new Angwin: PUC presents plans for "eco-village" at meeting tonight
- January 20, 2007 - Napa Register:
Mother Earth would approve
- January 18, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
PUC doesn't belong in building business
- January 18, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
Like small-town qualities? Oppose Angwin development
- January 18, 2007 - Napa Register:
Don't support plans for Angwin
- January 17, 2007 - General Plan Steering committee
letter from former Napa County Supervisor Mel Varrelman to steering committee chair Peter McCrae
- January 17, 2007 - St. Helena Star:
More houses would mean greater fire danger in Angwin
- August, 31, 2006 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin
planning process gets underway
- August 25, 2006 - Napa Register
Planning
ahead in Angwin
- August 24, 2006 - Napa Register
Guarding
the future of Angwin
- August 3, 2006 - St. Helena Star:
letter
from PUC employee Herb Ford (and a response)
- July, 27, 2006 - St. Helena Star:
Angwinites
skeptical of PUC development plans
- July, 20, 2006 - St. Helena Star:
Angwin
group formed to oppose development of rural land
- July 20, 2006 - Napa Register
Angwinites
take a hard look at growth proposal for village
- July 13, 2006 - Angwin Reporter A
chance to speak up
- July 5, 2006 - PUC web site: PUC
Reaches Agreement on Land Development
- SRA Press Release
- June 22, 2006 - St. Helena Star: PUC
decision on land could transform Angwin
- June 22, 2006 -St. Helena Star: Triad
Communities to shepherd Angwin development
- June 20, 2006 - PUC web site: PUC
to Work Towards Increasing Endowment
Other Letters and Articles
- April 30, 2009 - Newsletter to supporters
-
Robert Redford joins SRA Advisory Council. Listen to an
interview
on KQED where he discusses the Angwin issue.
A bald eagle
in Angwin. Our rare national bird sits majestically in a tree in Angwin (photo courtesy
Peter Avina). How can a big development be contemplated in an area with such rare and threatened
wildlife?
- Press release, February 10, SRA urges county supervisors -
Save rural environment in heart of angwin
more...
- Press release, February 10, Angwin community sees major victory. County punctures Angwin Urban Bubble,
pulls agricultural lands out of urban category. more...
- SRA Quarterly Newletter Nov 08-Jan 09
- January 27, Legal analysis of the Angwin Bubble
- Napa county Farm Bureau states its support for the SRA plan
- Sierra Club
submits GP comments on eliminating the "Urban Bubbles"
- Fundraising brochure
- SRA Press Release 3/19/2007
- Triad has a page describing their view of the
development
- Napa County district 3 Supervisor Diane Dillon
announces
her opposition to the development
- Picketing Triad - Angwin supporters have taken
to the streets to challenge the Triad scheme for Angwin.
A group has been picketing on Main Street one day a week for a long time now.
And lots of people are giving them the victory sign. Kellie Anderson organized this activity.
Pictures...
- Triad appears to be involved in a huge
potential development in Middletown. How many of these folks
would be driving through Angwin?
- There's another interesting web site set up apparently by PUC
alumni, to oppose the development
- PUC claims to protect the forest and oppose vineyards, but has been happy to
cut trees and sell to
vintners when it makes them money
- Open letter to the PUC Alumni
- 2003 letter discussing land sales proposed by PUC Board member Bryan Breckenridge
- Triad project gets
named "Worst Development" in Solano County.
Lawsuit is filed.
Friends of Lagoon Valley Park opposes the development. See also
Greenbelt
Alliance
- Triad is buying up
other property
in Napa Valley, and using vineyard property with large houses to avoid measure J votes
- The St. Helena Star
reports
that Triad was chosen for its track record on "...albeit smaller-scale, projects."
and that development will be larger than anything Triad Development has done before. On 6/29/2006, Curt Johansen,
Executive VP Triad Communities, confirmed this in a "pre-General Plan" meeting. He also stated that the
largest development Triad had done was
Hiddenbrooke
in Vallejo. When asked about the Star's report, he
said it must have been talking about size in acres as opposed to number of homes. However,
PUC's
press release
states that the college will retain 1000 acres after the development and it currently
owns roughly 1800 acres, meaning that 800 acres are planned for development. There are 1200 homes
in Hiddenbrooke on 1300 acres. Mr. Johansen stated many times as did Jim Henry, real estate agent for PUC,
that there has been no planning or discussions with respect to size of the development. This assertion by
both representatives of PUC seem to be inconsistent with Mr. Collins' statement in the Star and their own
press release. In the fall of 2006 we were finally told publicly by PUC that they planned to develop
885 acres. Funny how that matched what we figured out. We also know they had a signed development agreement
in November 2005 that included an option to purchase land. Does anyone believe that agreement didn't specify
specific parcels? We now find a letter
from 2001 where PUC talked about a sale of 885 acres, yet they kept claiming in early 2006 there were "no plans" and that
they didn't know how much land would be developed.
- Wildlake Ranch has been protected. Local people support open space.
Related news
Webmaster